Adaptive process management - Joining process model with everyday work routine

Agility has emerged as an important common characteristic of successful businesses. Organisations of any size benefit from quick response to volatile markets and rapid changing user requirements. Conventional business process modelling and execution approaches have found themselves overstretched in such situations due to the lack of flexibility and the amount of overhead required for predefined
process models.

The approach: A new approach supporting knowledge workers in
sharing process-related knowledge and process refinement

The approach is based on the insight that traditional “top-down” business process modelling approaches are too rigid and inflexible to capture the actual way processes are executed while pure “bottom-up” approaches may easily lose the focus and the alignment with organisational goals. Therefore, business process models are made agile and open by a joint hybrid approach. 

In order to achieve this vision, the strict distinction between build time and run time operations are softened. Process activities are presented to a user in a way that allows for individual adaptations. Any changes or enhancements to the process activities are documented and monitored. The advantage is two-fold: i) process-related valuable resources and experiences are proactively presented to the others in the right context; ii) when sufficient adaptation information are accumulated, we can decide whether or not to tune process models against the reality of actual process executions.

 

Foundation: Continuous tuning and adapting business process models

Continuous tuning and adapting business process models is facilitated through monitoring and analysing task patterns. We leverage the activities of a process model to attach pertinent knowledge and experience to a process, via a one-to-one relationship between task patterns and activities. That is for each activity, the corresponding task pattern collects all the information that is necessary for users to work on a concrete instance of the activity, e.g. attached resources, comments on an issue, or problems and solutions. When the process is actually executed, existing task patterns (e.g. P) will be retrieved from a pattern repository. The D4/KISSmir system helps users to populate P by recommending candidate resources to be used when executing a task. Upon finishing, the user can share her task adaptation with others by publishing it back to the task pattern repository.

The initial pattern should be thought of as a seed that triggers the process of attaching experience to a work context. These initial patterns are meant to grow larger while we learn more about the activities and mature over time adapting to the actual way in which the process is executed in practice. Maturing of task pattern indeed reflects back to evolve the process models according to the needs in practice. This is done by analysing adaptations---stored in the task pattern repository---made by individual users. In addition the system based selection of knowledge intensive activities will be mined to answer questions such as “how often has one activity been chosen?”; “has this selection been appropriate?”; etc.

Flyer

Publications

2009

Du, Ying, Riss, Uwe V., Chen, Liming, Ong, Ernie, Taylor, Philip, Patterson, David, Wang, Hui
Work Experience Reuse in Pattern Based Task Management
In: 9th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW '09), Graz, Austria, 2009, pp. 149-158

Abstract Pattern based task management has been proposed as a promising approach to work experience reuse in knowledge intensive work environments. While initial work has focused on the conceptualization and development of a generic framework, the process and user interaction of the task pattern lifecycle has not been addressed. In this paper, we introduce task copy augmented by Abstraction Services as a novel approach to facilitate task pattern creation and maintenance in a semi-automatic fashion. Also, we develop the architecture to demonstrate the underlying ideas by leveraging the advantage of semantic technologies.

Riss, Uwe V., Jurisch, Marlen, Kaufman, Viktor
Email in Semantic Task Management
In: Hofreiter, Birgit and Werthner, Hannes (eds.): Proceedings of 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, IEEE Computer Society, 2009, pp. 468-475